The EU should make sure that all its requirements are met before granting Turkey visa-free access to the Schengen area, Civil Liberties Committee MEPs stressed in a debate with the EU Commission on Monday.
Most MEPs criticised the Commission for proposing a visa waiver for Turkish nationals even though the country has not yet fulfilled all the criteria. Turkey should not be discriminated, but neither should it receive preferential treatment, they agreed.
Speakers pointed to the statements by Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan that Ankara would not change its antiterrorist legislation – one of the pending requirements – and voiced worries about the political situation in the country following the resignation of Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu, as well as threats to press freedom and human rights. Cypriot MEPs also reiterated that Turkey does not recognise Cyprus.
On Monday evening, MEPs were also presented with the opinion of the Parliament´s legal service on the legal aspects of the EU-Turkey deal on migration. Since the agreement was concluded on 18 March, MEPs have voiced concerns about its compatibility with EU and international law and have complained about the lack of an opportunity to subject it to democratic scrutiny.
The legal experts said that the March statement merely reflects a political commitment by the two parties and that it can in no way be considered an international agreement, since it is not legally binding.
They underlined that all legal changes stemming from this deal will have to follow the usual procedures, which in some cases involve Parliament, such as visa liberalisation or disbursing funds for assisting refugees in Turkey.
Many MEPs protested over what they saw as a “shady” deal with serious implications, which was reached at the highest EU level but left Parliament aside.