Cyprus Mail
Guest Columnist

Increased contributions will affect spending and recruitment

By Theodoros Mantis

The social insurance plan and the imminent implementation of the national health scheme (Gesy) are among the most crucial chapters of the state’s social policy.

From January 1, there  are be changes to the contributions by employees, the self-employed and the optionally insured to the Social Insurance Scheme (SIS). The contribution by employees increased from 7.8 to 8.3 per cent, by the self-employed from 14.6 to 15.6 per cent, and by the optionally insured from 13 to 14 per cent. The contribution by the optionally insured who are employed by a Cypriot employer abroad will increase from 15.6 to 16.6 per cent.

The contributions for the implementation of Gesy will also begin in 2019. As of March 1, employees will contribute 1.7 per cent of their wages, employers 1.85 per cent of each employee’s wages, while the self-employed will contribute 2.55 per cent of their insurable income. As of March 2020, with the full implementation of Gesy, these percentages will increase to 2.65 per cent for employees, 2.90 per cent for employers and 4 per cent for the self-employed.

Once the above regulations are introduced, there will be some significant changes for employees and businesses, with a domino effect of consequences that may have an impact on the economy as a whole.

The unifying, amending social insurance law adopted in 2010 includes the variations for the contributions to the specific fund up until the year 2039; however, these do not take into account various improbable, yet important factors for the Cyprus economy. The fact that there have been no changes to the relevant law since it was passed to balance it out, is quite telling, especially considering the significant developments that have taken place in the meantime, the most important of course being the haircut on bank deposits in March 2013.

The increase in contributions payable to the Social Insurance Fund (SIF) could well have been considered negligible, if it was not for this event. In reality though, this will be an additional expenditure for all categories of insured citizens, when many of them are still trying to recover. Furthermore, the increased costs reduce the chances of new recruitments, while also increasing the risk of reductions to workforces in businesses that find it difficult to manage the additional expense.

At the same time, the provision of a public healthcare service is undoubtedly one of the most important benefits that a well-run state can offer its citizens. In the case of Gesy, however, the substantive reduction of people’s disposable income may likely lead to a series of other problems, as regards the liquidity and the ability to repay debts by those who as a majority make up the middle class. This will make it difficult for individuals to maintain the same standard of living they had before the increase in social insurance contributions and the introduction of Gesy contributions.

It is imperative that the competent authorities promote counterbalancing measures so that the increases in SIF contributions and implementation of Gesy have the least possible financial impact on individuals and businesses.

Theodoros Mantis is head of human resources, payroll and immigration consulting services at Ellinas Finance PCL

Related posts

Our View: Unflattering report of president’s ties to Russian money cannot be ignored

CM: Our View

Our View: The farce of politicians’ asset statements must stop

CM: Our View

Impressions, assumptions, drunks and queues

CM Guest Columnist

Our View: HIO move will only serve to encourage abuse of Gesy

CM: Our View

Korea and Japan: the festering wound of history

Gwynne Dyer

Our View: Guterres wants to see real progress, not just provide a photo opportunity

CM: Our View