Cyprus Mail
Guest Columnist

Drive towards renewables has been sidetracked by gas

Solar power plant in Amareleja, southern Portugal. By 2017 it was producing 54 per cent renewable electricity

We’re nowhere near reaching our renewable energy targets and the reasons for the delay defy common sense

By Charles Ellinas

A renewables roadmap for Cyprus was the title of a comprehensive roadmap published in 2015 – but still very valid – by the inter-governmental International Renewable Energy Agency (Irena), of which Cyprus is a member. The report’s introduction states that “the Republic of Cyprus has engaged with Irena to develop a renewable energy roadmap for the country.”

Irena expressed hope that “this roadmap will prove useful in the country’s pursuit of accelerated renewable energy deployment. As our world strives for a future based on clean, secure and affordable energy for all, Cyprus can be the lighthouse that helps illuminate the course for others.”

Sadly four years later Cyprus has not progressed far in implementing Irena’s recommendations or advancing adoption of renewables, leaving Cyprus far behind.

Irena recommendations

The key findings from this roadmap are:

Based on this analysis, renewable energy could provide 25-40 per cent of Cyprus’ total electricity supply by 2030.

  • Solar PV can be the dominant source with about 500-1,000 megawatts (MW) of capacity providing 15-27 per cent of the electricity supply while wind can be the second most important renewable energy source with about 175-375MW of capacity providing 5-9 per cent of the electricity supply
  • The deployment of renewable energy in Cyprus has the potential to create between 11,000-22,000 jobs in Cyprus by 2030, based on Irena’s estimates of the job-creation potential of different renewable energy technologies (RETs)
  • The accelerated deployment of RETs along with the shift of thermal generation to natural gas is estimated to lower generation cost to EUR €83-92 per megawatt-hour (MWh) by 2030. Costs in 2013 were around €130/MWh (close to €190/MWh in 2018), based primarily on heavy fuel oil and diesel generation.

The roadmap went further and made detailed recommendations that would help increase use of renewables and minimise electricity generation costs in Cyprus.

Had its recommendations been fully implemented, according to the roadmap the renewable energy share of electricity by 2020 should have been between 18-28 per cent. Of course this has not been done. Only 8.9 per cent renewable energy share was achieved by 2017, against a modest, binding, target to reach 16 per cent renewables in electricity consumption by 2020, that now looks increasingly unachievable.

What is holding this up

It has been stated that it is not easy to increase use of renewables in power generation in Cyprus because our systems are designed to use fossil fuels and conversion is costly – we have to wait until electricity storage systems become available. It is claimed that this is what is holding us up. But is it correct?

Solar PV power costs have come down dramatically. Recent auctions in Egypt and Jordan have produced costs down to €22/MWh. Both countries are already benefiting hugely from renewables.

Use of storage batteries have now become widespread globally because of rapidly falling costs – between 2016-2019 unit prices halved. In California they are not building gas-fired power plants any more, despite access to cheap natural gas. New additions are predominantly solar PV plants combined with battery storage, because they are even cheaper and cleaner. In the UK 3.3GW of storage capacity is now operational and a further 5.4.GW has planning consent.

With the costs of solar PV and battery continuing to decline relentlessly, by 2020 unit costs are expected to be even lower.

Portugal and Spain relied mostly on fossil fuels for their electricity generation not that long ago. And they are not richer countries – the GDP per capita of Portugal is below Cyprus, just over 80 per cent, and that of Spain just above. By 2017 they were producing 54 per cent and 36 per cent renewable electricity respectively. Conversion to renewables does not appear to have led to insurmountable costs or problems. Even Greece has achieved 24.5 per cent, with a GDP per capita of just over 70 per cent of that of Cyprus.

So what is really holding us up? Why don’t we implement Irena’s roadmap, already available to us? And even better, why don’t we ask Irena to come and update this roadmap and advise us on its swift implementation, starting immediately? Irena would welcome the opportunity.

Import of LNG

Importing liquefied natural gas (LNG) appears to be the main reason behind the slow implementation of renewables. If, for example, a third of Cyprus electricity consumption per year is diverted to renewables, the unit cost of recovering LNG facilities investment and operational costs will go up by 50 per cent per kWh. This will make electricity prices even higher.

But importing LNG has a number of serious drawbacks as follows:

  • By the time the imported gas arrives at EAC, costs will be high because of having to recover the high cost of the LNG facilities and operations from small volumes of LNG, on top of the cost of imported LNG – this will lead to an increase in electricity prices
  • For the reasons explained above, it will delay even further the wider and faster implementation of renewables
  • The switch from heavy fuel oil to natural gas will not achieve the EU target of a 40 per cent reduction compared to 1990 levels; in fact it will not get anywhere near it. As a result, it will still leave Cyprus well above 1990 emission levels, requiring further measures to achieve 2030 targets
  • It will not help achieve the EU target of 32.5 per cent renewables by 2030 – this still requires implementation of the Irena roadmap.

In other words, soon after committing to LNG imports Cyprus will still be faced with problems achieving 2030 EU carbon emission and renewables targets and will require to implement further measures to achieve EU targets.

This means that importing LNG will have short term benefits, at best, and will not deal decisively with EU carbon emission and renewables targets – used as the main reason for considering imports of LNG in the first place. The major drawback is that this will come at an increase in costs to the Cypriot electricity consumer. Cyprus should disclose the results of any economic impact studies it has carried out justifying the import of LNG.

It is understood that the European Investment Bank (EIB) is considering investing in the LNG import project. So in effect, the European Commission (EC) through its grant and the EIB may end up subsidising a fossil fuel project which in doing so delays even further the implementation of renewables – thus going in the opposite direction to EU’s climate change objectives.

What we should be doing

Cyprus should move from words to action on climate change. Claiming that we are at the forefront of climate change action, but doing nothing about it does not inspire confidence. Cyprus’ universities are doing a lot but Cyprus is way behind.

We should implement Irena’s roadmap as a matter of priority and invite Irena to update it and assist with its implementation.

The roadmap and generally all energy-related plans and activities should be included within Cyprus’ Energy Plan to 2030. Cyprus is late in preparing this, so there is still time. And very importantly, this should go through meaningful public consultation as required by the EU.

The immediate goal to achieve Cyprus’ climate change targets can be realised through rapid implementation of renewables projects combined with battery storage. The process to be followed should be through competitive auctions. Those countries who have done so, including Egypt and Jordan with help from the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, have achieved dramatic results.

The EC and EIB should request the government to demonstrate how the import of LNG will help swift implementation of Irena’s roadmap, with a firm timetable to implement renewables targets between 2020 and 2030.

If that is not demonstrated, the EC and EIB should reconsider their investments into LNG imports and, instead, support renewables, and in particular in combination with energy storage support measures to address grid congestion and improve grid reliability and stability.

Dr Charles Ellinas is senior fellow at the Global Energy Centre of the Atlantic Council @CharlesEllinas

Related posts

Supreme Court full bench to judge civil servants pay appeal in Sept

Lizzy Ioannidou

Justice trumps all other considerations even if it means that the court would not be quorate

CM Reader's View

Greek PMs visit ‘of utmost importance’, spokesman says

CNA News Service

Number of Gesy doctors on the rise

Lizzy Ioannidou

Ayia Napa is an U 25s clubbing Mecca whether we like it or not

CM Reader's View

Thousand of illegal meds seized in Cyprus as part of Europe-wide doping crackdown

Annette Chrysostomou