Cyprus Mail
Guest ColumnistOpinion

The miracle on the Vistula: one of the most important anniversaries of today’s free Europe

The Polish-Bolshevik war was a founding moment for modern Poland and a crucial moment for the whole of Europe, even though the awareness of this may be lacking. It was the real clashing point of two diverse civilizations says current Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki

THERE are crucial moments in history that define the world’s future. For Poland and Europe, one such moment in the 20th century was the day of August 15, 1920. It was then that Poland, newly reborn in 1918, fought a decisive and victorious battle against the Bolshevik forces, who aimed to spread the communist revolution across Western Europe, devastated by the human and material losses of the Great War. According to British diplomat Edgar D’Abernon, it was the 18th most decisive battle in world history.

The Battle of Warsaw deserves to be listed on a par with D-Day as a critical turning point in the fight against totalitarianism in Europe. Because of the Iron Curtain that divided Europe as a result of the Yalta Conference, the significance of this specific event to the history of Europe did not get imprinted in the world’s memory as prominently as it deserves. This concerns both mass culture and history textbooks. It is time to finally fill those gaps in European collective memory. The anniversary of the Battle of Warsaw should be celebrated not only in Warsaw, not only in Poland, but in all of Europe. Even though it was Poland that won on the Vistula River, that victory concerned to a large extent the freedom of European nations – their freedom from the totalitarian darkness of communism.

From a historical perspective, the year 1920 closes a series of events which began with the partition of Poland by Prussia, Russia, and Austria in late 18th century. The Battle of Warsaw was the culmination of one of the most remarkable episodes of building a modern nation in European and global history. The nation without a state, emerging from the ruins of military and political defeat (including numerous Polish uprisings and collapses of successive substitutes of the state) at a time when Poland had been erased from the map of Europe, which extended from the end of the 18th century to the end of World War I.

The first Polish phenomenon worth mentioning is the scale of transformation of Polish society from a feudal one to one of Europe’s most modern civil societies – and without having any state institutions. An enormous network of social, cultural, and sport institutions, like the Sokół gymnastic association, financial unions, scientific societies, and school self-education societies can be compared only to reforms during the Meiji period enacted by the strong central power in Japan. The big Polish grassroots revolution in the second half of the 19th century was carried out in defiance of the powers occupying Poland. This is evidence that the Poles were able to learn a lesson from their own history and consolidate around the most modern concepts – positivism, democratic reforms, empowerment of women and social masses. Had there been no victory on the Enlightenment’s front of education, science and social thought, there would have been no victory on the military fronts.

The remarkable history of Poland’s first democratic revolution is not widely known in Europe. Sadly, because it is a tale that equals such gems of literature as Tocqueville’s Democracy in America. Soon after regaining independence in 1918, Poland adopted some of the most modern social and electoral legislations of the Western world. A shared sense of regained freedom prevailed over prejudice and a temptation to discriminate against wider segments of society. Poland had to build the unity and cohesion of the entire nation. The intellectual work undertaken at the end of the 19th century found its succession in the pro-state efforts once public institutions were regained after 1918.

Jozef Pilsudski looking at a map

The phenomenon of Poland is thus a story of democratisation different from that in Western Europe. This is a story of democratisation taking place along with the process of regaining independence and significance as a social and political entity. This is a story of modernity being built in defiance of imperialism, absolutism and despotism of powers that dominated Europe in the 19th century. The story which found its climax in the very demanding test of maturity for the state – less than two years after it regained independence when Poland had to face a totalitarian threat from the Bolsheviks.

The war with the Bolsheviks was a demonstration of an uncommon political unity of the Polish nation. In July 1920 the Government of National Defense was established with Wincenty Witos, leader of the peasant movement, as Prime Minister and Ignacy Daszyński, one of the leaders of the Polish Left, as Deputy Prime Minister. In light of the need to defend the very existence of the newly regained homeland, political differences among the fathers of Polish independence receded into the background. Poland’s political elite passed the test of maturity at the most critical moment. The Polish people massively supported the war effort, with the enormous involvement of the Catholic Church. The Bolshevik troops had to confront a nation that was not going to give up its hard-won independence.

The central point of the Polish-Bolshevik war was the Battle of Warsaw, a daring counter-attack on the Bolshevik forces advancing towards the centre of Poland, executed by commanders Marshal Józef Piłsudski, Chief of Staff Tadeusz Rozwadowski, and operational commanders General Władysław Sikorski and Edward Śmigły-Rydz.

The renowned French military historian Hubert Camon saw the enveloping maneuver which gave the Poles victory in the Battle of Warsaw as an emanation of the Napoleonic maneuver. With minimal losses, the Poles defeated the enormous Bolshevik army advancing with great impetus towards Western Europe. The war mobilisation of the Polish society was remarkable given that Poland was one of the most devastated countries in World War I. Also remarkable was the response by the Poles, as evidenced by how amazingly fast General Haller’s Volunteer Army was formed, to soon exceed 100,000.

The press called the Poles’ victory ‘the Miracle on the Vistula’ in a clear reference to ‘the Miracle on the Marne’ of World War I, when the French-British forces stopped the Germans.

The Polish-Bolshevik war was not only about clashes of huge armies, the spectacular effort of the entire society, or the strategic genius of the commanders. It was also about the struggle between intelligence services – that is cyphers, minds and intellects. The great hero of the covert front of the Battle of Warsaw was Jan Kowalewski, officer of the Polish military intelligence who broke Soviet cyphers. It was his work that helped get key information needed to create the Polish operational strategy. That unsung hero played a crucial role in halting Soviet aggression against Europe in 1920. Moreover, during World War II he was an important figure of the Tripod Action devised by the Polish government-in-exile in London and aimed at preparing the Allies’ invasion of the Balkans through making Italy, Roumania and Hungary withdraw from the alliance with the Axis powers. Alas, under pressure from Stalin, Roosevelt abandoned the plan to land in the Balkans which was pushed by Winston Churchill. If history had taken a different course, Jan Kowalewski might have saved East Central Europe twice from totalitarian Soviet domination.

The centennial of the Battle of Warsaw is one of the most important anniversaries of today’s free Europe. The Poles saved the West from the experience of totalitarian genocide as described by outstanding French historians in the famous Black Book of Communism. The Polish experience of communism with its tragic and long-term consequences for the country and its people is often misunderstood. The legacy of communism is a real problem, one that deforms the social and institutional reality of the countries that underwent democratic transformation. Władysław Reymont, the great Polish novelist and laureate of Nobel Prize in Literature, in his novel The Revolt (Polish: Bunt), which he wrote following the Battle of Warsaw, presents an allegory of a revolt raised by animals against man and, parallel to this, he portrays totalitarian mechanisms. He did so 20 years before George Orwell and his famous Animal Farm. Reymont could write this book because the Poles experienced confrontation with communism long before the West did. The Battle of Warsaw was also a culmination of more than five decades of Poland’s grassroots democratic revolution, one of the most unusual and unwritten histories of Europe of the second half of the 19th century and early 20th century. It is a story of great patriotism, religious devotion, military genius, and the significance of ciphers.

The Polish-Bolshevik war was a founding moment for modern Poland and a crucial moment for the whole of Europe, even though it is not widely known. It was the real clashing point of two diverse civilizations, and no one knew that better than Karol Wojtyła, born in 1920, who would later become John Paul II: “Since the day I was born, I’ve been greatly indebted to those who then took up the fight against the invaders and won, paying the ultimate price.” The obligation to repay this debt rests on us all. Today, 100 years after the victorious Battle of Warsaw, is a perfect opportunity to remind ourselves and the whole of Europe about it.

 The text is published concurrently in the Polish monthly Wszystko co Najważniejsze under a project realized in partnership with the Institute of National Remembrance. Translated by Grzegorz Gortat

Related Posts

Disenchanted: Disney attempts to break stereotypes of motherhood only to reinforce them

The Conversation

Our View: Local government reform is not worthy of the praise heaped upon it

CM: Our View

Joni, Cyprus and the ‘ra’

Colette NiReamonn Ioannidou

Obituary: ‘End of an era’, former Chinese President Jiang Zemin dies at 96

Reuters News Service

Our View: Christodoulides’ narrative knocked by ‘Diko memo’

CM: Our View

Our View: Swinging from a brutal regime to a utopia in prisons has not worked

CM: Our View