The fierce debate over the handling of traffic fines issued through speed cameras continued this week with MPs raising concerns about the legality of new procedures introduced by the police.

The controversy stems from a high number of undelivered fines. Since the introduction of speed cameras in 2022, over 600,000 fines have been issued, but more than 250,000 remain unreceived. In response, the police launched an online platform allowing people to check whether they have any unpaid fines.

The move has sparked criticism, with many questioning whether it is fair to place the responsibility of notification on the public, rather than the authorities. This has led to legal concerns and growing political criticism.

The police press office clarified that a significant number of photo surveillance fines remain undelivered to vehicle owners.

“These fines cover the period from January 1, 2022 to September 30, 2024. Vehicle owners are strongly urged to check if their vehicle has been recorded by the system and to address any outstanding issues,” a police statement said.

The police have persistently urged drivers to check the website www.cycamerasystem.com.cy and input their vehicle registration number, along with either their personal identification number, alien registration certificate (ARC) number, or company registration number.

“This will allow them to see if any fines are pending, including the number and reference details of each fine,” police said.

They can also visit the police website (www.police.gov.cy) and follow the payment instructions. For additional assistance, they can contact 80008009 on weekdays, between 8:00 am and 5:00 pm.

“This helpline is also available for any issues regarding payments or entering details.”

The police also clarified the role of Brinks, the security company managing the system.

“Brinks notifies the police when someone fails to pay their fine. After being alerted, we prepare a case file, and the person will be sent for trial over unpaid fines.”

In terms of vehicle owners’ legal responsibilities, the police statement said that if the registered owner was not driving the vehicle at the time of the offence, they must legally identify the person responsible. This can be done electronically via the website, avoiding bureaucratic processes.

“Failing to provide this information is an offence under the road traffic law (N. 86/72),” they warned.

The police also outlined important deadlines which are from January 8 to March 31 and also warned that “after this period, if a fine is not settled, a criminal case will be opened, and legal action will follow.”

They further explained the purpose of the extrajudicial settlement system:

“The aim is to prevent criminal prosecution and save valuable time for both the police and the courts.”

Despite these explanations, opposition members have expressed ongoing concerns. Aristos Damianou, an MP from Akel, described the system as a “global anomaly”, suggesting it unfairly places the burden on the public. He also questioned the lack of a clear legal framework to support the process.

During a session of the House legal committee this week, Polina Efthivoulou from the legal service defended the initiative.

“The online platform is not a replacement for official notifications. It simply provides citizens the opportunity to check and voluntarily settle their fines. The presumption of innocence is respected, and individuals still have the right to contest fines in court,” she told MPs.

The House session ended without a resolution and will resume next week. Lawmakers have requested further written submissions from the police and legal experts to address the unresolved legal and procedural concerns.

The involvement of Brinks in notifying authorities about unpaid fines has also raised questions about transparency and accountability.

As the debate continues, there is growing uncertainty about whether the system strikes the right balance between fairness, efficiency and justice.