Police reject ‘Sandy’ allegations after investigation

The police concluded on Wednesday that no evidence was found to support a series of serious allegations made public by journalist Makarios Drousiotis in the ‘Sandy’ case, with police chief Themistos Arnaoutis stating that an extensive investigation had determined the claims were unsupported by testimony, forensic findings and objective evidence.

Addressing a press conference at the police academy in Nicosia, attended by senior police officials including deputy chiefs Panikos Stavrou and Marios Ayiotis, Arnaoutis said the allegations had generated significant public concern due to “the nature of the claims involving the sexual abuse of a minor, corruption, blackmail, surveillance, cover ups and interference in state institutions”, while also naming individuals who held prominent positions in public life.

“The reports by Makarios Drousiotis have deeply concerned Cypriot society and have raised serious questions and strong public interest,” Arnaoutis said.

He stressed that the allegations were “not simple and ordinary reports” and explained that the role of the police was to investigate facts rather than public narratives.

“In a modern democracy, when such serious allegations are made, citizens have the right to know that they will be fully investigated independently, impartially and without exception,” he said.

Arnaoutis said the investigation was conducted by a large team of officers using all available scientific, technical and international resources.

The inquiry included witness testimony, forensic examinations, analysis of electronic data, financial investigations, examination of company records, checks of state registries, scrutiny of telecommunications data and judicial assessment of evidence.

He said the conclusions reached by investigators were based entirely on evidence gathered during the inquiry.

“The conclusion is clear. No testimony arose that would support the serious crimes being alleged that were publicly presented against the persons who were named or involved in these allegations,” he said.

According to Arnaoutis, investigators concluded that material forming the basis of the allegations, including disputed messages and audio extracts, was false and fabricated.

“The investigation showed that the contents of the disputed messages and audio excerpts, and the broader narrative that was presented, were false and fabricated,” he said.

Police further stated that examinations identified the use of an application capable of creating virtual communications that could be made to appear authentic by assigning sender names, message content and delivery times.

Arnaoutis said forensic examinations of devices connected to the case found no evidence that the communications presented publicly as genuine had ever existed.

“The judicial examinations conducted on the devices involved in the case showed that the communications did not exist as they were presented,” he said.

He added that the central allegations were tested against official records, financial data, independent testimony and technical evidence.

“Claims concerning persons, events, financial transactions, interference with institutions, surveillance and other serious allegations were found to be unfounded,” he said.

The police chief said the findings had been reviewed by officials from the legal service, who concluded that no criminal offences were established against the individuals accused in the allegations.

However, he revealed that instructions had been issued for further investigation into possible offences connected to the creation, publication and dissemination of the disputed messages and related online statements.

After assessing the evidence, the legal service directed police to examine whether criminal offences may have been committed in relation to “the creation, publication and public dissemination” of the material.

Arnaoutis emphasised that the investigation was conducted to establish facts rather than validate or dismiss public claims.

“The police did not investigate this case to justify or refute public accounts. It investigated it to establish real facts,” he said.

“The real facts, as they emerged from the investigation, are clear. The claims that were examined are refuted by the entire body of evidence and do not establish criminal offences against the persons who were named.”

He added that cases involving allegations capable of undermining public confidence in institutions required particular scrutiny and professionalism.

“Trust in institutions is not built on statements. It is built when institutions fulfil their duty, even in the most difficult and sensitive cases,” Arnaoutis said.

Presenting the findings in greater detail, police spokesman Vyron Vyronas said investigators examined every major allegation raised in the reports and compared them against witness statements, official records, financial data, travel information, forensic examinations and independent testimony.

He expounded that ‘Sandy’ having given multiple depositions to the police herself, had informed investigators that key elements of the narrative had been fabricated.

According to police, allegations concerning travel abroad to Germany, residence in shelters, financial arrangements, meetings with senior officials, interference in judicial appointments and alleged payments to secure silence were contradicted by documentary evidence and witness testimony.

Vyronas said investigators examined photographs, handwritten documents, audio recordings and electronic communications submitted as evidence.

In one instance, a forensic analysis of an audio recording determined that the voice attributed to an individual did not match the person identified by investigators.

The individual concerned also denied the authenticity of the recording.

Police further examined dozens of screenshots and messages which had been presented as genuine communications.

Vyronas said forensic specialists identified multiple technical inconsistencies, including conflicting operating system features, incompatible interface elements and irregular timestamps.

“The messages were not genuine,” he said, adding that the evidence indicated they had been created through software capable of generating fabricated conversations.

Investigators also examined claims involving financial transactions, company ownership structures, bank accounts, employment records and public service appointments, including an alleged position given to ‘Sandy’ at the presidential palace.

According to police, no evidence was found to support allegations of improper payments, influence or corruption.

Arnaoutis said the central allegations were tested against official records, financial data, independent testimony and technical evidence.

“Claims concerning persons, events, financial transactions, interference with institutions, surveillance and other serious allegations were found to be unfounded,” he said.

Vyronos said the findings had been reviewed by officials from the Legal Service, who concluded that no criminal offences were established against the individuals accused in the allegations.

However, he revealed that instructions had been issued for further investigation into possible offences connected to the creation, publication and dissemination of the disputed messages and related online statements.

Concluding his remarks, Vyronos states that “after assessing the evidence, the legal service directed police to examine whether criminal offences may have been committed in relation to “the creation, publication and public dissemination” of the material.