Cyprus Mail
BritainWorld

UK should only hold immigrants in detention centres for 28 days

file photo: protest against planned deportation of asylum seekers at gatwick airport near crawley
A detainee inside Brook House Immigration Removal Centre gestures as demonstrators protest outside of it against a planned deportation of asylum seekers from Britain to Rwanda, at Gatwick Airport

Britain should only hold people in immigration detention for a maximum of 28 days, a public inquiry concluded on Tuesday, after finding some detainees had been subjected to inhumane treatment, including the use of force or dangerous methods of restraint.

Inquiry chair Kate Eves said Britain should introduce a 28-day time limit on detaining people in immigration removal centres to improve “treatment and wellbeing”.

About 20,000 people are currently detained in one of seven immigration removal centres, awaiting either deportation or permission to enter Britain.

There is currently no limit on how long someone can be detained, though it will usually be unlawful to keep someone in detention if they cannot be removed within a reasonable time.

However, some detainees at Brook House immigration removal centre near Gatwick Airport in southeast England were held for up to two years, the inquiry heard.

Tuesday’s report comes as Britain’s ruling Conservatives and the opposition Labour party spar over the issue of immigration, which is set to be a major battleground in a national election expected next year.

The inquiry was prompted by a BBC documentary which revealed that staff employed by outsourcing company G4S, which ran Brook House, repeatedly physically and verbally abused detainees.

‘DEGRADING TREATMENT’

Eves found 19 incidents between April and August 2017, which she said amounted to a breach of detainees’ right to freedom from inhuman or degrading treatment.

She found that force was used against detainees too often and that “dangerous techniques” of restraining individuals were used by staff.

“The culture amongst G4S staff at Brook House was at times described to me by witnesses as ‘toxic’. I have reached the same conclusion,” Eves said.

“I have rejected the narrative portrayed by both the Home Office and G4S in their evidence that the events at Brook House were primarily the result of a small minority of G4S staff.”

A Home Office spokesperson said the abuse of detainees at Brook House in 2017 was unacceptable, but that the government had made “significant improvements since then” and would endeavour “to ensure these events never happen again.”

A G4S spokesperson said: “We were appalled when, in 2017, a number of former employees acted in a way that was contrary to our values, policies and their training and for this we are sorry.”

The G4S spokesperson also said the company no longer runs Brook House, which is now run by Serco, or any other immigration removal centres.

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has made “stopping the boats” a priority, with many asylum seekers arriving in Britain from Europe across the Channel.

But his government’s flagship policy of sending asylum seekers to Rwanda has failed to get off the ground, with a legal challenge being heard by the Supreme Court next month.

Follow the Cyprus Mail on Google News

Related Posts

Iraq’s Kurdish authorities working to resume Khor Mor gas supply after deadly attack

Reuters News Service

Russian missiles pound Ukrainian power plants in escalating campaign

Reuters News Service

U.S. intelligence believes Putin probably didn’t order Navalny to be killed

Reuters News Service

Turkey’s Erdogan postpones tentative White House visit, sources say

Reuters News Service

King Charles to resume public duties after cancer diagnosis

Reuters News Service

First Covid, now heat: online schooling returns to the Philippines

Reuters News Service